Supreme Court of Missouri· 3/21/2006
State v. Sanchez
Citations
- 186 S.W.3d 260
- 2006 Mo. LEXIS 43
- 2006 WL 696539
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that nothing is preserved for review where the defendant failed to make an offer of proof of his mental condition at trial.
- holding the State “has considerable leeway to make retaliatory arguments at closing[,]” and it “may retaliate to an issue raised by the defense even if the [State’s] comment would be improper.”
- reversing persistent offender status because the state failed to prove the two felonies committed on the same night in the same location were not a continuous course of conduct
- the State has considerable leeway to make retaliatory arguments at closing and may retaliate to an issue raised by the defense even if the prosecutor’s comment would be improper
- conviction of two counts of kidnapping of same victim permitted based on different ways person was victimized
- trial court has broad discretion in allowing, retaliatory arguments
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. LibertySupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-05-29· cited 94×
- State v. ChambersMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-07-17· cited 63×
- State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-01-29· cited 55×
- State v. LloydMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-11-27· cited 41×
- State v. GainesMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-05-04· cited 36×
- State v. RoggenbuckSupreme Court of Missouri· 2012-12-04· cited 28×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-12-10· cited 25×
- State v. HallMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-08-25· cited 18×
- State v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals· 2016-04-19· cited 18×
- State v. MinnerMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-03-09· cited 17×
- State v. BarrazaMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-09-25· cited 16×
- State of Missouri v. James W. LewisMissouri Court of Appeals· 2015-04-28· cited 16×
- State v. HillmanSupreme Court of Missouri· 2013-12-10· cited 15×
- State of Missouri v. Austin D. RileyMissouri Court of Appeals· 2014-06-24· cited 13×
- State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals· 2016-08-23· cited 11×
- State v. SheltonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2017-06-27· cited 10×
- State v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals· 2007-06-22· cited 9×
- State v. MarshallMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-01-19· cited 8×
- State v. DudleyMissouri Court of Appeals· 2010-02-23· cited 7×
- State v. GoemanMissouri Court of Appeals· 2012-11-21· cited 7×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ChaneySupreme Court of Missouri· 1998-03-24· cited 291×
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri· 1994-03-22· cited 236×
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Missouri· 2003-08-26· cited 232×
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1994-11-22· cited 231×
- State v. SilveySupreme Court of Missouri· 1995-03-21· cited 224×
- State v. ClaySupreme Court of Missouri· 1998-09-22· cited 207×
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Missouri· 1994-04-26· cited 83×
- State v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1999-06-29· cited 81×
- State v. KempkerSupreme Court of Missouri· 1992-02-25· cited 73×
- State v. RhodesSupreme Court of Missouri· 1999-04-13· cited 62×
- State v. StephensMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-11-19· cited 34×
- State v. FrenchSupreme Court of Missouri· 2002-07-23· cited 25×
- State v. MorovitzSupreme Court of Missouri· 1993-12-21· cited 25×
- State v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-10-28· cited 22×
- State v. BradshawMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-03-29· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.