Court of Appeals of Arizona· 3/1/1978
State v. Sanchez
Citations
- 579 P.2d 568
- 119 Ariz. 64
- 1978 Ariz. App. LEXIS 484
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the word “shall” in a wrongful death statute means “must” or “may” depending on the context of the statute and the legislative intent
- the word \shall\ in a wrongful death statute means \must\ or \may\ depending on the context of the statute and the legislative intent
- § 12-613 “merely authorize[s] but d[oes] not mandate . . . a jury to award . . . damages”
- “a statute can not be applied retroactively to impair a vested right.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Howard, Hathaway, Fernandez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- City of Gladewater v. PikeTexas Supreme Court· 1987-04-01· cited 233×
- Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-04-24· cited 131×
- Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-03-12· cited 109×
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Arizona Corp. CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1989-06-01· cited 70×
- Clark v. CassidyHawaii Supreme Court· 1981-12-01· cited 46×
- Welch v. McClureArizona Supreme Court· 1979-07-02· cited 30×
- Pruitt v. PavelinCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-06-19· cited 29×
- Hampton v. Glendale Union High School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-04-09· cited 26×
- Wilson v. Riley Whittle, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-12-20· cited 24×
- Havasupai Tribe of the Havasupai Reservation v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-11-28· cited 16×
- Wiper v. Downtown Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-01-07· cited 15×
- White v. Greater Arizona Bicycling AssociationCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-08-08· cited 7×
- Lillian M. Shore v. County Of MohaveNinth Circuit· 1981-05-11· cited 5×
- McClure v. Country Life Ins. Co.D. Arizona· 2018-08-08· cited 3×
- Sandpiper Resorts Development Corp. v. Global Realty Investments, LLCD. Arizona· 2012-10-16· cited 1×
- Wiper v. Downtown Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1985-10-10
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court· 1963-04-25· cited 255×
- Chappell v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri· 1968-02-12· cited 68×
- City of Minneapolis v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-01-23· cited 66×
- Village of Park Forest v. FaganIllinois Supreme Court· 1976-10-01· cited 59×
- Fisher v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida· 1965-02-17· cited 57×
- Smith v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-04-29· cited 54×
- Ark. State Highway Comm. v. MabrySupreme Court of Arkansas· 1958-07-01· cited 52×
- Hennigan v. Atlantic Refining CompanyE.D. Pennsylvania· 1967-11-09· cited 49×
- Downs v. Sulphur Springs Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 1956-05-15· cited 44×
- Foss v. Maine Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1973-09-10· cited 44×
- Price v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyArizona Supreme Court· 1972-10-24· cited 41×
- Brown v. Village of DemingNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1952-04-23· cited 36×
- Lauer v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court· 1976-12-08· cited 28×
- State v. StoneArizona Supreme Court· 1969-05-14· cited 26×
- Western Coach Corporation v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-03-27· cited 18×
- Ahmed v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-01-16· cited 18×
- City of Gary v. FalconeIndiana Court of Appeals· 1976-05-27· cited 17×
- Desforge v. City of West St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1950-05-11· cited 14×
- Michaud v. City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1964-10-12· cited 14×
- Myers v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1871-10-15· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.