Skip to main content
· 12/1/1981

Clark v. Cassidy

Citations

  • 636 P.2d 1344
  • 64 Haw. 74
  • 1981 Haw. LEXIS 171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • distinguishing between \substantive rights\ and \remedies\ or procedural laws which merely prescribe methods of enforcing or giving effect to existing rights
  • distinguishing between \substantive rights\ and \remedies\ or procedural laws which merely prescribe methods of enforcing or giving effect to existing rights
  • “It is an established rule that no law has any retrospective operation, unless otherwise expressed or obviously intended.” (Parenthesis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richardson, Ogata, Menor, Lum, Nakamura

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.