· 12/1/1981
Clark v. Cassidy
Citations
- 636 P.2d 1344
- 64 Haw. 74
- 1981 Haw. LEXIS 171
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing between \substantive rights\ and \remedies\ or procedural laws which merely prescribe methods of enforcing or giving effect to existing rights
- distinguishing between \substantive rights\ and \remedies\ or procedural laws which merely prescribe methods of enforcing or giving effect to existing rights
- “It is an established rule that no law has any retrospective operation, unless otherwise expressed or obviously intended.” (Parenthesis omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richardson, Ogata, Menor, Lum, Nakamura
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.