Skip to main content
· 3/12/1986

Hall v. A.N.R. Freight System, Inc.

Citations

  • 717 P.2d 434
  • 149 Ariz. 130
  • 1986 Ariz. LEXIS 194

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a vested property right is “actually assertable as a legal cause of action or defense or is so substantially relied upon that retroactive divestiture would be manifestly unjust”
  • explaining that substantive rights may not be impaired once vested
  • finding defense of contributory negligence to be a substantive right that vests when it is actually assertable as a legal defense
  • discussing constitutional issues arising when the legislature-expressly provides for retroactive application
  • rights vest on commencement of legal proceedings and may not be retroactively affected by statute
  • rights vest on commencement of legal proceedings and may not be retroactively affected by statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Holohan, Hays, Cameron, Feldman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.