Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1/31/2007

State v. Samuels

Citations

914 A.2d 1250
189 N.J. 236
2007 N.J. LEXIS 25

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that evidence was adequate to support a conviction for robbery but also concluding that a charge on the lesser crime of attempted robbery was required
finding \[t]he evidence in its entirety and reasonable inferences therefrom were adequate to warrant submission of the charge\ to the jury
reversing conviction because jury was charged both correctly and mistakenly on applicable law, and “there [was] no assurance that the jurors understood and applied the correct legal principles in reaching their verdict”
explaining that the two concepts, although overlapping, are distinct
“Because the conduct and words of co-conspirators is generally shrouded in silence, furtiveness and secrecy, the conspiracy may be proven circumstantially.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
listing the elements of a conspiracy under N.J.S.A. 2C:5-2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Long, Lavecchia, Zazzali, Rivera-Soto, Albin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.