State v. Farrad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding attempted robbery is cognizable where defendant wrapped his face in a scarf so that “only his eyes were visible” before entering a restaurant, walked towards the restaurant counter, “place[d] his hand into his right coat pocket” (and had a gun in that pocket
• reversing case for new trial but noting that “guilty verdict may be molded to convict on a lesser-included offense even if the jury was not instructed on that offense if (1) defendant has been given his day in court, (2
• defining theft as “ ‘the unlawful taking or exercise of unlawful control over property of another with purpose to deprive him thereof ” (quoting State v. Carlos, 187 N.J.Super. 406, 412, 455 A.2d 89 (App.Div.1982), certif. denied, 93 N.J. 297, 460 A.2d 693 (1983)
• reversing case for new trial but noting that “guilty verdict may be molded to convict on a lesser- included offense even if the jury was not instructed on that offense if (1) defendant has been given his day in court, (2
• Model Penal Code version of attempt offense adopted as common law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).