New Mexico Court of Appeals· 6/30/2008
State v. Aleman
Citations
- 194 P.3d 110
- 145 N.M. 79
- 2008 NMCA 137
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the DRE protocol is based upon specialized knowledge
- noting that the DRE serves two primary purposes: to help officers identify impairment, and to identify the category of drugs that has caused the impairment
- backtracking on its earlier holding in State v. Lasworth, 42 P.3d 844 (N.M. Ct. App. 2001)
- backtracking on its earlier holding in State v. Lasworth, 42 P.3d 844 (N.M. Ct. App. 2001)
- noting that the DRE has been “the subject of (continued...
- discussing each of these factors in the context of admitting evidence of the DRE protocol under the Daubert standard
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robinson, Pickard, Castillo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DalyNebraska Supreme Court· 2009-11-20· cited 243×
- Parkhill v. Alderman-Cave Milling & Grain Co. of N.M.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-10-06· cited 30×
- State v. ARMENDARIZ-NUNEZNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-02-09· cited 22×
- Trujillo v. Rio Arriba County ex rel. Rio Arriba County Sheriff's DepartmentD. New Mexico· 2016-12-19· cited 8×
- State v. Armendariz-NunezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-03-23· cited 8×
- Quintana v. AcostaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-10-21· cited 5×
- State v. RuffinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2018-10-22· cited 5×
- v. MarstonColorado Court of Appeals· 2021-02-11· cited 2×
- Quintana v. AcostaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-12-12· cited 2×
- In re WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-10-30· cited 2×
- v. MarstonColorado Court of Appeals· 2020-08-06· cited 1×
- Parkhill v. ADLERMAN-CAVE MILLING & GRAINNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2010-12-03
- State of Tennessee v. Benjamin Scott BrewerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2020-04-06
- Janice Elaine Bragaw v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2021-02-26
- State v. Michael OlenowskiSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2023-11-15
- State v. Cano-SammisNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2024-06-05
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-08-30· cited 297×
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-02-15· cited 266×
- State v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-08-25· cited 90×
- State v. BaityWashington Supreme Court· 2000-02-03· cited 75×
- Lee v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2004-07-14· cited 58×
- Heath Ex Rel. Holdyn H. v. La Mariana ApartmentsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-03-12· cited 50×
- State v. KlawitterSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1994-06-30· cited 47×
- State v. SampsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-24· cited 41×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-18· cited 39×
- State v. LasworthNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2001-12-07· cited 28×
- State v. HueglinNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2000-11-14· cited 25×
- State v. AmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-08-04· cited 19×
- United States v. EverettD. Nevada· 1997-06-25· cited 18×
- Heath ex rel. Heath v. La Mariana ApartmentsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-11-02· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.