Skip to main content

State v. Caron

Citations

  • 534 A.2d 978
  • 1987 Me. LEXIS 888

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding officer’s observation of “brief, one time straddling of the center line of an undivided highway” did not justify stop (emphasis added)
  • holding that the officer lacked reasonable articulable suspicion upon observing a “single, brief straddling of the center line of the undivided highway, 15 with no oncoming traffic in sight and no vehicles passing on the left, not constituting a violation of any traffic law”
  • finding an officer's suspicion after observing only one straddle of the center line to be a mere hunch or speculation, and not objectively Page 4 of 8 reasonable
  • stop may not be based on several brief, incidental lane violations that did I not present a traffic safety issue
  • one straddle of centerline does not alone lead to reasonable articulable suspicion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nichols, Roberts, Wathen, Glassman, Scolnik, Clifford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.