State v. Salazar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Our persistent violator statute, I.C. § 19-2514, does not create a new or separate offense, rather it makes possible an enhancement of punishment for a particular crime when one has previously been convicted of two felonies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hall v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1980-06-14· cited 116×
• Pearson v. State
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1975-03-10· cited 53×
• State v. Gary L. Schall
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2014-10-29· cited 44×
• State v. Alanis
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1985-12-18· cited 26×
• People v. Anderson
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1979-08-30· cited 10×
• State v. Ewell
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2009-01-13· cited 6×
• Gibson v. Legursky
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1992-03-05· cited 4×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Spencer v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1966-11-21· cited 1,416×
• Gryger v. Burke
  Supreme Court· 1948-10-11· cited 726×
• Moore v. Missouri
  Supreme Court· 1895-11-18· cited 240×
• State v. Dunn
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1967-11-21· cited 60×
• Mayo v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1957-12-18· cited 24×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1946-06-12· cited 23×
• State v. Losieau
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1967-12-08· cited 19×
• State v. Gaskey
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1963-11-12· cited 12×
• State v. Salazar
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1973-03-20· cited 5×