Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/2/1973
State v. Jim
Citations
- 508 P.2d 462
- 13 Or. App. 201
- 1973 Ore. App. LEXIS 1130
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that where words used in indictment are sufficiently defined in statute, the definitions need not be included in the indictment
- “Where the words used in the indictment necessarily imply other words those words need not be used in the indictment.”
- indictment adequate when read in conjunction with the statute defendant is accused of violating
- charge of theft, without additional specificity, sufficient to state a crime
- charge of theft, without additional specificity, sufficient to state a crime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwab, Jndge, Langtry, Foley, Jndges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. WashingtonOregon Supreme Court· 1975-12-26· cited 111×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-06-12· cited 67×
- State v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court· 1978-01-31· cited 40×
- State v. ShadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-12-24· cited 34×
- State v. SandersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-03-13· cited 33×
- State v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-09-05· cited 22×
- State v. DravesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-07-29· cited 22×
- State v. KeysCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-04-05· cited 21×
- State v. DechandCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-06-25· cited 15×
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-04-23· cited 15×
- State v. SpearsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-11-12· cited 15×
- State v. RouthCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-09-12· cited 12×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-07-23· cited 12×
- Cheely v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1993-04-23· cited 10×
- State v. LaemoaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-03-10· cited 10×
- State v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-05-25· cited 10×
- State v. TidymanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-11-09· cited 9×
- State v. SagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-08-26· cited 9×
- State v. RipkaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-26· cited 8×
- State v. BoucherCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-05-21· cited 7×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. . DumarNew York Court of Appeals· 1887-10-04· cited 105×
- The People v. PatrickIllinois Supreme Court· 1967-09-29· cited 87×
- State v. NussbaumOregon Supreme Court· 1971-12-15· cited 37×
- State v. ReynoldsOregon Supreme Court· 1961-11-22· cited 24×
- State v. HouseOregon Supreme Court· 1971-09-29· cited 23×
- People v. KamslerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1966-01-18· cited 18×
- State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court· 1966-01-26· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. FreeloveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1889-11-11· cited 13×
- State v. PackardOregon Supreme Court· 1871-09-15· cited 12×
- People v. HaynAppellate Court of Illinois· 1969-11-04· cited 11×
- State v. BrantonOregon Supreme Court· 1906-11-21· cited 11×
- State v. DickinsonMontana Supreme Court· 1898-12-05· cited 10×
- State v. MimsOregon Supreme Court· 1963-10-23· cited 9×
- State v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court· 1965-05-26· cited 8×
- State v. HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1971-08-10· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.