Skip to main content

State v. Jim

Citations

  • 508 P.2d 462
  • 13 Or. App. 201
  • 1973 Ore. App. LEXIS 1130

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that where words used in indictment are sufficiently defined in statute, the definitions need not be included in the indictment
  • “Where the words used in the indictment necessarily imply other words those words need not be used in the indictment.”
  • indictment adequate when read in conjunction with the statute defendant is accused of violating
  • charge of theft, without additional specificity, sufficient to state a crime
  • charge of theft, without additional specificity, sufficient to state a crime

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwab, Jndge, Langtry, Foley, Jndges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.