Skip to main content

State v. Russell

Citations

  • 954 N.W.2d 920
  • 308 Neb. 499

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that defendant was adequately apprised of his right to appeal and that he did not instruct trial counsel to file direct appeal did not require further inquiry on appeal from postconviction action into whether defendant was prejudiced by counsel’s failure to file direct appeal
  • defendant who relies upon his or her testimony with little or no supporting documentary evidence does so at risk of nonpersuasion
  • to show prejudice, defendant must demonstrate reasonable probability that but for counsel’s deficient performance, result of proceeding would have been different.
  • in evidentiary hearing for postconviction relief, postconviction trial judge, as trier of fact, resolves conflicts in evidence and questions of fact, including witness credibility and weight to be given witness’ testimony
  • in evidentiary hearing for postconviction relief, postconviction trial judge, as trier of fact, resolves conflicts in evidence and -7- questions of fact, including witness credibility and weight to be given witness’ testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.