Fitzke v. City of Hastings

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that although the plaintiff did not allege that it made a demand upon the public defendants, evidence that the defendants took action over the plaintiff’s objections sufficed to show that such a demand would be useless
• “a district court may disturb the decision of a CRA only if it determines that the decision was illegal or is not supported by the evidence and is thus arbitrary, unreasonable, or clearly wrong”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).