Arizona Supreme Court· 1/5/1988

State v. Rushing

Citations

749 P.2d 910
156 Ariz. 1
1988 Ariz. LEXIS 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that 4 STATE v. WILSON Decision of the Court jury’s acquittal on one charge and conviction of lesser-included offense demonstrated the alleged prejudicial evidence “did not so inflame the jury as to render it incapable of making critical factual determinations”
concluding an acquittal on one charge and a lesser- included offense conviction shows prejudicial evidence “did not so inflame the jury as to render it incapable of making critical factual determinations”
considering the jury’s decision to convict a defendant of lesser-included offenses as indication that the challenged evidence “did not so inflame the jury as to render it incapable of making critical factual determinations”
“the owner of property is competent to give an opinion of its value”
lack of juror passion indicated by conviction of lesser-included offense
lack of juror passion indicated by conviction of lesser-included offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moeller, Gordon, Feldman, Cameron, Holohan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.