New Mexico Court of Appeals· 9/5/1985
State v. Rushing
Citations
- 706 P.2d 875
- 103 N.M. 333
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the defendant had no reasonable expectation of finality in a sentence obtained through misrepresentations at the time of sentencing
- holding that the defendant 14 had no reasonable expectation of finality in a sentence obtained through 15 misrepresentations at the time of sentencing
- stating that an oral sentence is not a final judgment 10 and is subject to change until reduced to writing in a final judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarid, Donnelly, Minzner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BucholzSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-04-01· cited 25×
- State v. PorrasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1998-12-23· cited 15×
- State v. SoutarNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-02-10· cited 13×
- State v. RatchfordNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-06-03· cited 13×
- State v. BallardNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-05-02· cited 10×
- State v. BallardNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2012-03-08· cited 6×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2021-10-14· cited 5×
- State v. JenkinsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2023-12-20· cited 5×
- State v. BowieNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-06-14· cited 3×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.