State v. Ratchford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that oral order granting a new trial takes precedence over rule stating that motions not acted on within a certain time are deemed denied
• holding that oral order granting a new trial takes precedence over rule stating that motions not acted on within a certain time are deemed denied
• holding that automatic denial was not effective when district court had orally announced its intention to grant a new trial before the date the motion would be deemed denied
• holding that district court’s verbal grant of a motion for a new trial was effective notwithstanding that a written order embodying the verbal one was not filed within 30 days after the motion was deemed denied
• stating that case management was one of the purposes of the automatic denial provision of Rule 5-614(C) NMRA 2004, which governs motions for new trial in criminal cases
• stating that the automatic denial provision of Rule 5-614(C) NMRA 2003 has as one of its purposes to provide courts with the management of their cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).