Skip to main content

State v. Diaz

Citations

  • 673 P.2d 501
  • 100 N.M. 524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a court is free to change an orally pronounced sentence until a written judgment is filed
  • holding that a court is free to change an orally pronounced sentence until a 16 written judgment is filed
  • holding that a court is free to change 12 an orally pronounced sentence until a written judgment is filed
  • recognizing that while 1 a matter is pending before the district court, a district court may change its mind at any 2 time prior to entry of the final ruling
  • oral pronouncement of sentence is not a final judgment; in reviewing sentence appellate court guided by written judgment
  • “It is weU established that an oral ruling by the trial court is not a final judgment, and that the trial court can change such ruling at any time before the entry of written judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riordan, Payne, Sosa, Federici, Stowers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.