Idaho Supreme Court· 11/24/2010
State v. Ruiz
Citations
- 248 P.3d 720
- 150 Idaho 469
- 2010 Ida. LEXIS 196
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to address harmless error issue because State did not argue that error was harmless
- “The State has not argued that the error was harmless. Therefore, we vacate the judgment of conviction.”
- “The State has not argued that the error was harmless. Therefore, we vacate the judgment of conviction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Horton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Hector B. Almaraz, Jr.Idaho Supreme Court· 2013-04-01· cited 80×
- State v. Russell James ParkerIdaho Supreme Court· 2014-08-06· cited 57×
- State v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court· 2020-05-04· cited 30×
- State v. SamuelIdaho Supreme Court· 2019-09-11· cited 28×
- State v. FordyceIdaho Court of Appeals· 2011-08-08· cited 15×
- State v. IversonIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-01-06· cited 13×
- Grove v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2017-02-02· cited 11×
- State v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court· 2021-05-20· cited 10×
- State v. Jose Luis SanchezIdaho Court of Appeals· 2017-02-27· cited 2×
- State v. RamboIdaho Supreme Court· 2023-12-20· cited 2×
- BatteryIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-01-06
- State v. Russell James ParkerIdaho Supreme Court· 2014-04-04
- State v. Jose Luis SanchezIdaho Court of Appeals· 2017-02-17
- State v. BuckIdaho Court of Appeals· 2023-09-20
- Stacey Lewis Grove v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals· 2017-02-02
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.