State v. Meister
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3569
Syllabus
CRIM.R. 32.1 – INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL – RES JUDICATA: The common pleas court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's postsentence motion under Crim.R. 32.1 to withdraw his guilty pleas on the ground that his trial counsel had been ineffective concerning the plea: where defendant's challenge raised issues that could have been raised on direct appeal, res judicata applied.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “a provisional discharge plan is a necessary step before the judicial appeal panel could even begin to consider a provisional discharge”
- noting that once the person petitioning for provisional discharge satisfies the burden of production, the commissioner bears the “burden of persuasion on the merits of a discharge petition”
- “[Appellant] has failed to produce evidence that, if proven, would entitle him to a provisional discharge. . . . Consequently, [appellant] has also failed to produce evidence that, if proven, would entitle him to a discharge.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Myers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.