Skip to main content

State v. Ruggles

Citations

  • 242 P.3d 643
  • 238 Or. App. 86
  • 2010 Ore. App. LEXIS 1218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • to violate ORS 162.247, the “person must refuse to obey the order, and that verb implies knowledge and intent (in contrast, for example, to fail to obey”) (emphases in original)
  • “It is difficult to imagine a prosecution in which the state could prove that a defendant knew or should have known that a particular order was lawful.” (Emphasis in original.)
  • “It is difficult to imagine a prosecution in which the state could prove that a defendant knew or should have known that a particular order was lawful.” (Emphasis in original.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Schuman, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.