State v. Enyeart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing “refuse” in ORS 162.247 to imply a “conscious intention to violate a directive” that is “consistent with an intentional culpable mental state”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hendricks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-08-19· cited 23×
• State v. Rapp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-08-26· cited 10×
• State v. Whitten
  Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-08· cited 7×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Woodson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-02-11· cited 20×
• State v. Ruggles
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-10-20· cited 11×
• State v. McNair
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-01-30· cited 5×