State v. Illig-Renn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, “[o]rdinarily, the appellate courts of this state will decline to address an undeveloped argument”
• explaining that, “[o]rdinarily, the appellate courts of this state will decline to address an undeveloped argument”
• explaining that we ordinarily “will decline to address an undeveloped argument”
• subject matter jurisdiction never waived; can be raised by any party or court sua sponte at any stage of proceedings
• where party “plainly put in issue the proper construction of the statute,” appellate court has obligation to correctly construe it, regardless of the parties’ arguments
• where party “plainly put in issue the proper construction of the statute,” appellate court has obligation to correctly construe it, regardless of the parties’ arguments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).