State v. Rourke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “we have found no cases that limit the application of [the factor of abuse of a position of trust] to child victims” and “defendants who are adult authority figures”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Rourke
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-10-22· cited 59×

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kindem
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-12-07· cited 267×
• State v. Garcia
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-02-13· cited 171×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-02-08· cited 133×
• State v. Misquadace
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-05-09· cited 115×
• State v. Schantzen
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-07-15· cited 82×
• State v. Givens
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-03-08· cited 64×
• State v. Spain
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-02-25· cited 50×
• State v. Campbell
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-04-26· cited 43×
• State v. Cermak
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-02-17· cited 38×
• State v. Carpenter
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-08-03· cited 25×
• State v. Elvin
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-03-03· cited 15×
• State v. Wickstrom
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-05-05· cited 12×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-01-19· cited 12×
• State v. Lee
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-02-12· cited 11×
• State v. Hines
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-02-08· cited 9×
• State v. Olson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1989-03-14· cited 8×
• State v. Ahern
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-05-22· cited 6×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-12-04· cited 6×
• State v. Larson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-12-17· cited 5×
• State v. Lamar
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1991-07-30· cited 5×