State v. Rosse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that appellant was in custody in part because of presence of seven officers
• concluding interrogation was custodial where subject was not handcuffed, but was seated in a car in the presence of several officers who had confronted her with guns drawn, and several other indicia of custody were present
• court used fact that defendant was frisked to support conclusion that defendant was in custody for Miranda purposes
• courts used presence of at least seven police officers at the place of questioning to support conclusion that defendant was in custody for Miranda purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).