State v. Ross

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that although two offenses were not related for joinder purposes, they were probative for Spreigl purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Edwards
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-11-19· cited 62×
• State v. Ivy
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-09-25· cited 3×
• State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Nicholas Lee Hill, Respondent
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2025-07-23
• State of Minnesota v. Phillip Charles Jones
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2024-06-17
• State of Minnesota v. Ivan Contreras-Sanchez
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2026-04-15

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ness
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-01-10· cited 107×
• Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-09-14· cited 84×
• State v. Profit
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-03-18· cited 74×
• State v. Doughman
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-04-04· cited 52×
• State v. Conaway
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-05-14· cited 46×
• State v. Kendell
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2006-11-09· cited 43×
• State v. Wakefield
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-03-16· cited 30×
• State v. Kates
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-08-29· cited 3×