State v. Rose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Clearly, where an individual uses a motor vehicle beyond the scope of the owner’s consent, he or she has violated R.C. 2913.03 because no consent has been given for the particular use.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• White v. Westfall
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2009-09-01· cited 108×
• Overstreet v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1993-10-19· cited 30×
• State v. Howell
  Hamilton County Municipal Court· 1994-05-25· cited 5×
• State v. Bryant
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-08-29· cited 3×
• State v. Smith
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-14· cited 1×
• State v. Almeyda
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-07
• State v. Lee
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-08-04