Court of Appeals of Virginia· 10/19/1993
Overstreet v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 435 S.E.2d 906
- 17 Va. App. 234
- 10 Va. Law Rep. 389
- 1993 Va. App. LEXIS 510
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a larceny is committed when an individual has “the intent to deprive the owner of his property permanently . . . . Common law larceny, and its statutory lesser included offenses, require a trespassory taking.”
- defendant permitted to borrow his co-worker’s truck to go to lunch but then failed to return it
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Koontz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Carter v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2010-06-10· cited 51×
- Montague v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2003-05-06· cited 39×
- Julio Castillo v. Eric Holder, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 2015-01-14· cited 37×
- McEachern v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2008-10-21· cited 29×
- Carter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2009-09-01· cited 8×
- Robert Meredith Otey, Jr. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2020-04-07
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Maye v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1972-06-12· cited 40×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-10-08· cited 36×
- Slater v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1942-03-02· cited 26×
- Reese v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1985-10-11· cited 22×
- People v. HaywardMichigan Court of Appeals· 1983-07-07· cited 17×
- State v. RoseOhio Supreme Court· 1992-05-06· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.