Skip to main content

State v. Roper

Citations

  • 254 Or. App. 197
  • 294 P.3d 517
  • 2012 WL 6608265
  • 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1526

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that occupant had manifested an intention to prohibit the public from approaching a residence in part because the occupant had posted a “No Trespassing” sign “immediately adjacent” to the driveway
  • holding that fence plus signage “objectively manifested intent to exclude the public”
  • upholding grant of motion to suppress under the Oregon Constitution because defendant’s “No Trespassing” signs manifested his intent to exclude the public from his fenced yard, notwithstanding open gate
  • upholding grant of motion to suppress under the Oregon Constitution because defendant‟s “No Trespassing” signs manifested his intent to exclude the public from his fenced yard, notwithstanding open gate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nakamoto, Schuman, Wollheim

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.