State v. Cam

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a sign indicating that property is private “does not in and of itself suggest that visitors to the property are excluded”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. McKee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-07-22· cited 9×
• State v. Kinslow
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-06-26· cited 3×
• State v. Hockema
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-13· cited 2×
• State v. Summerlyn
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-08· cited 2×
• State v. Dearmitt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-03-05· cited 2×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-05-03· cited 1×
• State v. Coffman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-08
• State v. Faught
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-12-02

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ehly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
• Orchard v. Mills
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-29· cited 11×
• State v. Roper
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-12-19· cited 11×
• State v. Cam
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-02-06· cited 11×