State v. Roman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• characterizing movement and restraint of the victim as incidental and finding evidence insufficient to establish abduction by secretion or holding where unlikely to be found

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rafay
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-06-18· cited 125×
• City of Seattle v. Guay
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-09-11· cited 39×
• State v. Treat
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-12-18· cited 22×
• State v. Swenson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-09-04· cited 20×
• State v. Roman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-04-23· cited 16×
• State v. Welker
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-04-26· cited 6×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-05-12· cited 4×
• State v. King
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-06-23· cited 3×
• State v. Galbreath
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-01-04· cited 3×
• State v. Austin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-12-02

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Striker
  Washington Supreme Court· 1976-12-16· cited 177×
• State v. Greenwood
  Washington Supreme Court· 1993-02-04· cited 169×
• State v. Pacheco
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-10-23· cited 84×
• State v. Carpenter
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-11-20· cited 50×
• State v. Anderson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1993-07-15· cited 45×
• State v. Hudson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-08-29· cited 33×
• State v. Hunnel
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1988-09-06· cited 28×
• State v. Lee
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-06-30· cited 27×
• State v. Stewart
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-09-26· cited 24×
• State v. Phillips
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-07-27· cited 8×