Court of Appeals of Washington· 9/6/1988

State v. Hunnel

Citations

760 P.2d 947
52 Wash. App. 380
1988 Wash. App. LEXIS 532

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“When the State sits idly by and does nothing with the information available to it, it cannot claim that it made a good faith effort to locate the defendant.”
defendant was not amenable to process during his absence from Washington
defendant lived in Oregon when charge was filed and returned to Washington six months later; he was amenable to process upon return, and State failed to act diligently in not arresting him for 11 months
defendant was not amenable to process during his absence from Washington
rule applies even though no rule or statute required findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Petrich, Alexander, Worswick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.