Washington Supreme Court· 7/15/1993

State v. Anderson

Citations

855 P.2d 671
121 Wash. 2d 852
1993 Wash. LEXIS 153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting in dicta that the Supreme Court “did apply a ‘good faith and due diligence’ requirement to the CrR 3.3(g)(2
due diligence required States effort to use an interstate detainer to acquire jurisdiction over a defendant incarcerated in another state
fundamental fairness requires that prosecuting authorities act in good faith and with due diligence in bringing a de fendant to trial
State must exercise due diligence to bring a defendant to superior court where a mechanism exists to do so such as the interstate agreement on detainers
State must exercise due diligence to bring a defendant to superior court where a mechanism exists to do so such as the interstate agreement on detainers
State must exercise due diligence to bring a defendant to superior court where a mechanism exists to do so, such as the interstate agreement on detainers.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Utter, Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.