Court of Appeals of Maryland· 8/28/1986
Whitaker v. Prince George's County
Citations
- 514 A.2d 4
- 307 Md. 368
- 1986 Md. LEXIS 286
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the “additional marginal deterrence” of applying the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule to civil trials “would not ... outweigh the cost to society in excluding what might concededly be relevant and reliable evidence”
- “Though [Janis ] cannot be said to stand for the proposition that evidence may never be excluded in a civil proceeding, it nonetheless severely undermined those cases in lower courts which applied the exclusionary rule to civil proceedings.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Couch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Adams v. NVR Homes, Inc.D. Maryland· 2000-02-17· cited 72×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DiCiccoCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-07-18· cited 58×
- Robinson v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-08· cited 38×
- Motor Vehicle Administration v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-10-14· cited 34×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-10-14· cited 32×
- Murphy v. Liberty Mutual Ins.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-04-28· cited 31×
- Ashford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-04-19· cited 26×
- Bhagwat v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-05-16· cited 24×
- Dodson v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-05· cited 23×
- People v. NeckopulosAppellate Court of Illinois· 1996-11-08· cited 16×
- Sheetz v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-03-03· cited 15×
- In Re Maurice M.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-12-19· cited 14×
- 1995 CORVETTE VIN 1G1YY22P585103433 v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-23· cited 14×
- Strickland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-02-20· cited 8×
- Sensabaugh v. GordayCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-02-05· cited 7×
- Long v. LongCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-11-29· cited 7×
- Olson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-11-28· cited 7×
- Mayor of Baltimore v. One 1995 Corvette Vin No. 1G1YY22P585103433Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-02-26· cited 5×
- Heit v. StansburyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-12-20· cited 3×
- Sheetz v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-07-09· cited 2×
Cites
61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court· 1974-01-08· cited 3,415×
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court· 1976-04-20· cited 2,133×
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1967-01-23· cited 1,543×
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 1,453×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 1,184×
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,167×
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court· 1973-11-19· cited 1,102×
- One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1965-04-29· cited 867×
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court· 1967-01-23· cited 776×
- In Re DebsSupreme Court· 1895-05-27· cited 761×
- Gardner v. BroderickSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 696×
- United States v. PeltierSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 693×
- Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 663×
- Uniformed Sanitation Men Ass'n v. Commissioner of Sanitation of New YorkSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 436×
- McCarthy v. ArndsteinSupreme Court· 1924-10-20· cited 393×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.