Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/13/2002
State v. Divito
Citations
- 42 P.3d 918
- 180 Or. App. 156
- 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 391
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “we review for legal suf- ficiency of the foundational evidence” when the question is authentication
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Deits, Brewer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court· 2000-05-04· cited 302×
- State v. OlmsteadOregon Supreme Court· 1990-10-25· cited 77×
- State v. BusbyOregon Supreme Court· 1993-01-28· cited 30×
- State v. DysonOregon Supreme Court· 1981-12-02· cited 29×
- Kahn v. Pony Express Courier Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-03-14· cited 27×
- State v. ParkCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-05-01· cited 13×
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-09-16· cited 10×
- State v. DivitoOregon Supreme Court· 2000-05-12· cited 8×
- State v. DysonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-06-15· cited 6×
- State v. DivitoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-02-25· cited 5×
- Benchmark Properties v. HipolitoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-07-07· cited 4×
- Marcoulier v. UmstedCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-01-23· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.