New Mexico Supreme Court· 5/11/1970
State v. Rodriguez
Citations
- 469 P.2d 148
- 81 N.M. 503
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the record did not suggest the indisputable innocence of the appellant, or that his conviction would shock the conscience
- holding that the record did not suggest the indisputable innocence of the appellant, or that his conviction would shock the conscience
- “If there is substantial evidence . . . to support the verdict of the jury, we will not resort to fundamental error.”
- “If there is substantial evidence . . . to support the verdict of the jury, we 14 will not resort to fundamental error.”
- “If there is substantial evidence . . . to support the 3 verdict of the jury, we will not resort to fundamental error.”
- “If there is substantial evidence . . . to support the verdict of the jury, we will not resort to fundamental error.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tackett, Watson, McKenna
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. CunninghamNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2000-03-09· cited 761×
- State v. BarberNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2004-05-19· cited 344×
- State v. BenallyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2001-10-17· cited 299×
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-10-28· cited 174×
- State v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-03-09· cited 106×
- State v. ReyesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2002-07-24· cited 98×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1983-01-20· cited 73×
- State v. NobleNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1977-04-19· cited 69×
- Doe v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-08-20· cited 57×
- State v. TraegerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2001-07-31· cited 53×
- State v. WilsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-08-30· cited 46×
- State v. HamiltonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1976-12-13· cited 38×
- State v. RosaireNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-12-23· cited 38×
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-07-29· cited 36×
- State v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1978-11-21· cited 28×
- State v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-09-21· cited 28×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-02-15· cited 21×
- State v. DavisNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-06-25· cited 16×
- State v. CurleeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-08-05· cited 14×
- State v. JaramilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1973-02-16· cited 13×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 174×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1914-08-17· cited 154×
- State v. ComptonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1953-05-19· cited 76×
- State v. McAfeeNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 72×
- State v. OrtegaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-09-06· cited 71×
- State v. LottNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1963-12-23· cited 54×
- State v. LopezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 47×
- State v. FernandezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1952-09-22· cited 38×
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1967-12-01· cited 35×
- State v. SandersNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1950-12-09· cited 34×
- State v. UlibarriNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1960-09-15· cited 27×
- State v. TapiaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1968-06-28· cited 26×
- State v. SisnerosNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-11-08· cited 24×
- State v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1968-04-19· cited 22×
- State v. SenaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1950-05-20· cited 22×
- Torres v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1935-04-08· cited 21×
- Smith v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-09-09· cited 19×
- State v. HendersonNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-02-13· cited 16×
- State v. HallNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1935-12-24· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.