Tapia v. Panhandle Steel Erectors Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing court will resolve all disputed facts in favor of the successful party and will indulge in all reasonable inferences in support of the verdict
• where appellant contended on appeal that witness’s testimony on direct examination was nullified by his testimony on cross-examination, resolution of discrepancy was for fact finder
• where appellant contended on appeal that witness's testimony on direct examination was nullified by his testimony on cross-examination, resolution of discrepancy was for fact finder
• fact that there may have been contrary evidence that would have supported different verdict does not permit reviewing court to weigh evidence
• the trial court determines the credibility of witnesses and where the truth lies
• substantial evidence standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).