State v. Rodano
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 8221
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B) application to reopen ineffective assistance of trial counsel ineffective assistance of appellate counsel the Confrontation Clause Grand Jury arson investigating agent and expert reports. The agent who investigated a fire changed her opinion from incendiary to undetermined after the grand jury had indicted the defendant for arson. The grand jury proceedings were not unfair to the defendant because the trial jury heard the agent's full testimony. Appellate counsel argued this issue, but was not ineffective for not framing the issue in terms of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. A tangential reference to the fire marshall did not implicate the Confrontation Clause regarding the fire marshall.
Judges: McCormack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-22· cited 986×
- State v. ReedOhio Supreme Court· 1996-02-14· cited 335×
- State v. AllenOhio Supreme Court· 1996-12-18· cited 116×
- State v. RodanoOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-23· cited 61×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.