Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/30/2019

State v. Rodano

Citations

2019 Ohio 2117

Syllabus

Affirmed delayed motion for new trial Crim.R. 33 new evidence ineffective assistance newly announced decisions. Crim.R. 33 does not provide for a delayed motion for new trial based on newly announced decisions, and as a result, the trial court did not err in denying the defendant leave to file such a motion.

Judges: S. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Jones v. Barnes
Supreme Court· 1983-07-05· cited 7,925×
Florida v. Nixon
Supreme Court· 2004-12-13· cited 963×
McCoy v. Louisiana
Supreme Court· 2018-05-14· cited 738×
State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-11-29· cited 208×
State v. Pasqualone
Ohio Supreme Court· 2009-02-04· cited 72×
Reynolds v. Budzik
Ohio Court of Appeals· 1999-12-03· cited 59×
State v. Dues
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-07-27· cited 24×
State v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-01-25· cited 8×
State v. Gulley
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-03· cited 7×
State v. Bryan
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-29· cited 7×
State v. Rodano
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-17· cited 1×
State v. Rodano
Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-02-14· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.