State v. Robison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s denial of departure despite defendant’s presentation of mitigating factors, including insubstantial criminal history, acceptance of responsibility, and demonstration of remorse
• noting district court considered acceptance of responsibility as potential mitigating factor but affirming district court’s denial of motion to depart under K.S.A. 21-4643[d]
• affirming district court’s denial of departure despite defendant’s presentation of mitigating factors, including insubstantial criminal history, acceptance of responsibility, and demonstration of remorse
• no abuse of discretion even though defendant had insubstantial criminal history, accepted responsibility, and demonstrated remorse
• reasonable people could agree with district court’s denial of departure motion, which included a lack of significant criminal history
• no error even though defendant had little criminal history, accepted responsibility, and demonstrated remorse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Beaman
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-10-19· cited 106×
• State v. Reyna
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2010-06-11· cited 101×
• State v. Spencer
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2011-03-18· cited 73×
• State v. Martinez
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2010-07-30· cited 70×
• State v. Bird
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-11-22· cited 64×
• State v. Harsh
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2011-11-18· cited 35×
• State v. Rochelle
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-04-12· cited 33×
• State v. Floyd
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2013-02-15· cited 28×
• State v. Trevino
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2010-03-26· cited 23×
• State v. Baptist
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-07-13· cited 17×
• State v. Dillon
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-12-03· cited 4×