Skip to main content

State v. Bird

Citations

  • 298 Kan. 393
  • 312 P.3d 1265
  • 2013 WL 6145300
  • 2013 Kan. LEXIS 1261

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Substantial competent evidence is legal and relevant evidence a reasonable person could accept to support a conclusion.”
  • \Substantial competent evidence is legal and relevant evidence a reasonable person could accept to support a conclusion.\
  • among other factors, district court relied on nonviolent nature of past crimes in determining defendant was not threat to society as factor in support of departure
  • acceptance of responsibility can be a mitigating factor in support of a departure.
  • finding nonstatutory factors can be considered for departure sentence
  • evidence defendant is not a threat to society

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moritz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.