State v. Robinson
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 4880
Syllabus
Defendant-appellant did not establish that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Defendant-appellant did not preserve for appeal his objections to the trial court's ruling on plaintiff-appellee's motion in limine. The trial court did not err by failing to ensure, sua sponte, that defendant-appellant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to testify in his own defense.
Judges: Preston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court· 1976-12-27· cited 1,190×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 1988-08-31· cited 695×
- State v. SallieOhio Supreme Court· 1998-05-13· cited 583×
- State v. GrubbOhio Supreme Court· 1986-12-26· cited 498×
- State v. BeyOhio Supreme Court· 1999-05-19· cited 451×
- State v. KoleOhio Supreme Court· 2001-07-18· cited 263×
- State v. FrenchOhio Supreme Court· 1995-07-05· cited 244×
- City of Defiance v. KretzOhio Supreme Court· 1991-05-15· cited 240×
- United States v. Vincent WebberSixth Circuit· 2000-03-31· cited 134×
- City of Newark v. LucasOhio Supreme Court· 1988-12-21· cited 128×
- State v. EvickOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-26· cited 39×
- State v. HasslerOhio Supreme Court· 2007-09-27· cited 28×
- Brown v. BurnettOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-31· cited 17×
- State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-19· cited 8×
- Ross v. St. Elizabeth Health CenterOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-03-26· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.