State v. Robinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Joint representation is not a per se violation of the right to effective assistance of counsel.\
• counsel decided not to call a witness, whom he also represented, due to an actual conflict of interest
• counsel decided not to call a witness, whom he also represented, due to an actual conflict of interest
• \[A] co plaint that an attorney erred in failing to call a certain witness is ordinarily rejected as tac ical.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jones
  Washington Supreme Court· 2002-05-09· cited 147×
• State v. Barragan
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-10-03· cited 80×
• State v. Harell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-03-11· cited 40×
• State v. Regan
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-02-26· cited 35×
• State v. Kitt
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2019-06-18· cited 17×
• State v. Shaver
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2003-04-03· cited 16×
• State v. Potts
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-11-17· cited 14×
• State v. James
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-05-17· cited 13×
• Wimberly v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2005-08-26· cited 10×
• State v. Tjeerdsma
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-02-12· cited 5×
• State v. Dhaliwal
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-09-03· cited 5×
• State v. Malone
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-01-09· cited 2×
• State v. McCarty
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-02-06· cited 1×
• In re Pers. Restraint of Lewis
  Washington Supreme Court· 2023-02-02