State v. Robinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because of unique nature of summary contempt, policies behind exclusionary rule do not require suppression of evidence obtained when contemnor is searched in preparation of incarceration following finding of criminal contempt
• because of unique nature of summary contempt, policies behind exclusionary rule do not require suppression of evidence obtained when contemnor is searched in preparation of incarceration following finding of criminal contempt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Huminski v. Corsones
  Second Circuit· 2005-01-18· cited 234×
• Huminski v. Corsones
  Second Circuit· 2004-10-07· cited 161×
• State v. Lussier
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-04-28· cited 72×
• People v. Guthrie
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2012-10-01· cited 4×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stone v. Powell
  Supreme Court· 1976-10-04· cited 4,303×
• United States v. Calandra
  Supreme Court· 1974-01-08· cited 3,415×
• Green v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 426×
• State v. Oakes
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-09-06· cited 62×
• In Re Saunders
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1980-04-08· cited 9×
• State v. Laflin
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-04-09· cited 5×