Skip to main content

State v. Robinson

Citations

  • 872 P.2d 43
  • 73 Wash. App. 851
  • 1994 Wash. App. LEXIS 183

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a person is also not an accomplice if that person's sole involvement with the crime arises after the crime was committed
  • robbery was completed when codefendant grabbed victim’s purse after a struggle and walked away
  • “Pursuant to [the transactional view of robbery], a robbery can be considered an ongoing offense so that, regardless of whether force was used to obtain property, force used to retain the stolen property or to effect an escape can satisfy the force element of robbery.”
  • “Pursuant to [the transactional view of robbery], a robbery can be considered an ongoing offense so that, regardless of whether force was used to obtain property, force used to retain the stolen property or to effect an escape can satisfy the force element of robbery.”
  • “When it is undisputed that the defendant used force to take personal property unlawfully from a person ‘or in his presence against his will’ but used no additional force to retain the property or to effect an escape, the transactional view [of robbery] has no application.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scholfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.