Court of Appeals of Washington· 5/7/1990
State v. Manchester
Citations
- 790 P.2d 217
- 57 Wash. App. 765
- 1990 Wash. App. LEXIS 170
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant was guilty of robbery when he took property outside the presence of the owner but used force to retain it
- holding that force or fear used to retain property and effectuate escape constitutes robbery
- defining \presence\ as a taking of something within a victim's control
- shoplift followed by pursuit outside the store and force to retain property sufficient to establish robbery
- shoplift followed by pursuit outside the store and force to retain property sufficient to establish robbery
- Defendant could be convicted of first degree robbery for using force to retain property after he left store without paying for it
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Grosse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. RandolphMichigan Supreme Court· 2002-07-11· cited 66×
- State v. HandburghWashington Supreme Court· 1992-06-04· cited 56×
- State v. TruongCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-05-29· cited 38×
- State v. WitherspoonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-10-16· cited 23×
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-03-14· cited 18×
- State v. LindsayCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-11-07· cited 18×
- State v. NamCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-01-17· cited 14×
- State v. Chamroeum NamCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-01-17· cited 12×
- State v. McIntyreCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-06-14· cited 7×
- State v. McIntyreCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2002-06-28· cited 4×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Connecticut v. BarrettSupreme Court· 1987-01-27· cited 572×
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1966-05-24· cited 198×
- Mason v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1958-10-13· cited 77×
- State v. StewartWashington Supreme Court· 1989-10-19· cited 44×
- State v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court· 1968-07-11· cited 33×
- Rumph v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-15· cited 24×
- People v. BeebeMichigan Court of Appeals· 1976-07-20· cited 20×
- People v. Herbert SandersMichigan Court of Appeals· 1970-12-01· cited 19×
- State v. WilbornMissouri Court of Appeals· 1975-05-06· cited 18×
- State v. BlewittCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-04-23· cited 10×
- State v. RiosCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-02-09· cited 9×
- State v. VelickaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1956-05-08· cited 6×
- State v. TolsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-03-08· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.