State v. Robinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding exposition testimony about reactions of sexual assault victims was permissible to rebut defendant’s attempt to “capitalize on the misconception that all sexual assault victims are emotional following the assault”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Alberico
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1993-08-30· cited 297×
• Vallinoto v. DiSandro
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1997-02-11· cited 77×
• State v. Hammer
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2000-07-11· cited 63×
• State v. DeSantis
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1990-06-25· cited 47×
• State v. Williams
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1992-06-17· cited 46×
• State v. Obeta
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-03-24· cited 45×
• Flanagan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-14· cited 38×
• State v. Hollingsworth
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1991-02-19· cited 23×
• Gross v. Woodman's Food Market, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2002-11-14· cited 16×
• State v. Brown
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2003-01-02· cited 13×
• In Re Interest of DSP
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1992-02-18· cited 10×
• Audrey A. Edmunds v. Jodine Deppisch
  Seventh Circuit· 2002-12-18· cited 9×
• State v. Alberico
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-09-26· cited 6×
• State v. Jobert L. Molde
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2025-06-13· cited 1×
• Edmunds, Audrey A. v. Deppisch, Jodine
  Seventh Circuit· 2002-12-18
• State v. Lamb
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1989-02-01
• State v. Addison
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2019-03-26