North Dakota Supreme Court· 12/23/2021
State v. Roberts
Citations
- 968 N.W.2d 183
- 2021 ND 235
Syllabus
Corroboration of an accomplice's testimony is required under N.D.C.C. § 29-21-14. The corroboration need not establish a prima facie case, but must tend to connect the defendant with the crime. Any error based on the district court's failure to give a jury instruction regarding the corroboration required for an accomplice's testimony was harmless.
Judges: Jensen, Jon J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1982-07-30· cited 71×
- State v. ThielNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-07-28· cited 56×
- State v. SmudaNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-02-01· cited 50×
- State v. HaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-11-20· cited 34×
- State v. BrunetteNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1914-10-10· cited 27×
- State v. ThorsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1978-03-02· cited 22×
- State v. KelleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-01-18· cited 9×
- State v. ReddigNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2016-02-18· cited 4×
- State v. MertzNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2012-07-12· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.