· 2/1/1988
State v. Smuda
Citations
- 419 N.W.2d 166
- 1988 N.D. LEXIS 33
- 1988 WL 6346
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating it would be unreasonable to conclude defendant’s presence could have or would have affected proceedings or result
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Levine, Erickstad, Meschke, Gierke, Vande Walle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.