Skip to main content

State v. Roberts

Citations

  • 185 Wash. App. 94
  • 339 P.3d 995

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • exercising review of whether there was statutory authority for forfeiture despite defendant’s failure to file a motion under CrR 2.3(e)
  • reversing forfeiture provision because the State failed to provide statutory authority for the forfeiture and the 13 No. 51284-0-II sentencing court did not provide any statutory authority for its forfeiture order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Maxa

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.