State v. Ritch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing conviction in absentia because defendant never received notice of right to be present at trial as required by criminal practice rules
• finding error and reversing when a trial court failed to make required findings that an appellant received notice of his right to be present at trial and a warning that he would be tried in his absence should he fail to attend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hudson
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-05-30· cited 52×
• State v. Patterson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 51×
• State v. Castineira
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-07-17· cited 15×
• City of Aiken v. David Michael Koontz
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-03-20· cited 14×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-05-11· cited 9×
• State v. Wrapp
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2017-08-16· cited 6×
• State v. Truesdale
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-06-18· cited 3×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Jackson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-03-05· cited 12×
• State v. Fleming
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-10-02· cited 4×