State v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that before a trial in absentia may begin, the trial court should make findings of fact regarding whether the appellant had received notice of his right to be present and been warned that the trial would proceed in his absence upon a failure to attend court
• explaining before a trial in absentia begins, the trial court must make findings of fact regarding whether the appellant had received notice of his right to be present and whether the appellant had been warned that the trial would proceed in his absence upon a failure to attend court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Patterson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 51×
• State v. Bailey
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-23· cited 41×
• State v. Ravenell
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-03-17· cited 21×
• State v. Castineira
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-07-17· cited 15×
• City of Aiken v. David Michael Koontz
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-03-20· cited 14×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-05-11· cited 9×
• State v. Ritch
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-04-13· cited 7×
• State v. Truesdale
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-06-18· cited 3×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Fleming
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-10-02· cited 4×